Fgfr signaling is required as the early eye field forms to promote later patterning and morphogenesis of the eye
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A major step in eye morphogenesis is the transition from optic vesicle to optic cup, which occurs as a ventral groove forms along the base of the optic vesicle. A ventral gap in the eye, or coloboma, results when this groove fails to close. Extrinsic signals, such as fibroblast growth factors (Fgfs), play a critical role in the development and morphogenesis of the vertebrate eye. Whether these extrinsic signals are required throughout eye development, or within a defined critical period remains an unanswered question. RESULTS: Here we show that an early Fgf signal, required as the eye field is first emerging, drives eye morphogenesis. In addition to triggering coloboma, inhibition of this early Fgf signal results in defects in dorsal-ventral patterning of the neural retina, particularly in the nasal retina, and development of the periocular mesenchyme (POM). These processes are unaffected by inhibition of Fgfr signaling at later time points. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that Fgfs act within an early critical period as the eye field forms to promote development of the neural retina and POM, which subsequently drive eye morphogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".