Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre de ce memoire-creation, l'auteur de ces lignes a realise un documentaire d'une duree de 27 minutes et intitule Le Grand Cycle. Suite a cela et a la maniere d'un praticien reflexif, il a redige ce document d'accompagnement qui se veut une reflexion sur le processus de creation, un questionnement base sur l'experience de realisation du film. Le Grand Cycle trace le portrait d'un couple de voyageurs a velo qui sillonnent la planete depuis plus de 15 ans. Des gens pour qui le velo se retrouve au centre de leur existence puisque c'est sur lui que repose leur mode de vie. Il a ete tourne a l'ete 2010, alors que Pierre Bouchard et Janick Lemieux traversaient le nord du Quebec par les routes forestieres reliant la riviere des Outaouais au Fjord du Saguenay. Le but etait de raviver le souvenir d'evenements vecus et de sensations enfouies par le geste quotidien et la memoire des sens. Puis, par un processus d'expression de l'experience, amener les protagonistes a donner retrospectivement un sens aux actions posees et a la trajectoire empruntee, les amener a faire de leur vie une histoire coherente a partir de ces moments choisis. Ensuite, en utilisant le materiel puise a meme le reel, l'intention du realisateur etait de creer une zone de flottement entre le present et le passe, un territoire mental qui serait image a l'etape du montage. ______________________________________________________________________________ MOTS-CLES DE L’AUTEUR : Cinema, documentaire, portrait, velo, recit de pratique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.301 | 0.091 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".