MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507192393

Critical length of short fatigue cracks

2013· article· en· W1507192393 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. Plumtree, N. Untermann

Bibliographic record

VenueGruppo Italiano Frattura Digital Repository (Gruppo Italiano Frattura) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCrack closureMaterials scienceStress intensity factorCrack growth resistance curveStress concentrationStructural engineeringStress (linguistics)Crack tip opening displacementFatigue limitRange (aeronautics)Composite materialMechanicsFracture mechanicsForensic engineeringPhysicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model is presented that predicts the fatigue limit of a metal by determining the critical crack length.The threshold stress range for short fatigue crack growth is related to the strain intensity factor range by taking into consideration surface strain distribution and crack closure.In particular the surface strain concentration factor has been carefully evaluated.This factor decreases, together with an increase in crack closure, as crack length increases within the short crack range.The resulting threshold stress for crack growth increases to a maximum that corresponds to the fatigue limit stress.This occurs at the critical crack length.In addition to successfully predicting the fatigue limit stress, the model is capable of determining the crack initiation stress range and depth of non-propagating cracks as a function of material, grain size and stress ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGruppo Italiano Frattura Digital Repository (Gruppo Italiano Frattura)Same topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207