MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Irradiance Differences in the Violet (405 nm) and Blue (460 nm) Spectral Ranges among Dental Light‐Curing Units

2010· article· en· W1507252679 on OpenAlex
Richard Bengt Price, D. Labrie, Frederick A. Rueggeberg, Christopher M Felix

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrradianceOpticsMaterials scienceSpectroradiometerWavelengthLight-emitting diodeSpectral power distributionOptoelectronicsPhysicsReflectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Problem: Previous studies identified nonuniformity in the irradiance at the tip end of a variety of dental light‐curing units (LCUs) and correlated those differences with potential clinical implications, but the spectral dependence of the irradiance uniformity has not yet been addressed. Purpose: This study examined the irradiance uniformity across emitting tips of LCUs at two emission wavelengths, 405 and 460 nm. Two broadband emission light units (quartz‐tungsten‐halogen [QTH] and plasma arc [PAC]), and four commercial light‐emitting diode (LED)‐type LCUs were examined. Materials and Methods: The spectral radiant power from six LCUs was measured using a laboratory grade spectroradiometer (Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA). The spatial and spectral characteristics of irradiance across the emitting tips of these light units were recorded through 10‐nm wide bandpass filters (centered at 405 nm [violet] or 460 nm [blue]) using a laser beam analyzer (Ophir‐Spiricon, Logan, UT, USA). Irradiance distributions were reported using two‐dimensional contour and three‐dimensional isometric color‐coded images. Irradiance uniformity at the tip end was determined using the Top Hat Factor (THF) for each filtered wavelength. Results: Irradiance distributions from the QTH and PAC units were uniformly distributed across the tip end of the light guide, and THF values, measured through the 405 and 460‐nm filters, were not significantly different. However, the three polywave LED units delivered non‐uniform irradiance distributions with THF values differing significantly between the 405 and 460‐nm emission wavelengths for each unit. Areas of nonuniformity were attributed to the locations of the various types of LED chips within the LCUs. Conclusion: All three polywave LED units delivered a nonuniform irradiance distribution across their emitting tip ends at the two important emission wavelengths of 405 nm and 460 nm, whereas the broadband light sources (QTH and PAC) showed no evidence of spectral inhomogeneity at these wavelengths. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Since the rate and extent of polymerization of photo activated restorative materials is highly dependent on delivering radiant energy at specific wavelengths, the nonuniform spectral distribution across the emitting tips of polywave light‐emitting diode curing lights may affect the resulting properties of some photocured resins and their potential for long‐term clinical success. ( J Esthet Restor Dent 22:363–378, 2010)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it