Documental y nación.com. Políticas públicas e identidad: Québec-Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un nuevo modo de inscribir lo real en lo documental, el dispositivo - gran angular- como parte de la expresion y de las relaciones entre la obra y el espectador convierten a Les Raquetteurs (1958, de Michel Brault/Gilles Groulx), en un boton en muestra de la busqueda del directo antes del directo. La calle, el ritual, el sentido de pertenencia, la camara como mediacion, como espacio para ir estableciendo esas constantes que definen, desde Canada, un modelo con variaciones: cinema vecu, cinema verite, «le cinema d'ici». La existencia de una productora Publica, la Office National du Film (ONF)/National Film Board (NFB), acabara por aunar, desde 1939, un entramado de practicas y autores en los que se definen diferentes epocas del documental como operador identitario y que nos obliga, como primer paso, a optar por una observacion de tipo panoramico o a tratar de saber, desde iin caso especifico, el de Quebec, por que via un pais se representa en un cierto tipo de documental (el cinema verite), convirtiendolo en label internacional para la cinematografia canadiense, cuando se idea y se realiza desde lo real. Un film y un autor fundamental, Pour la suite du monde (1963, de Pierre Perrault), no solo se convierte en el primer largometraje -de Quebec y de Canada- que se presenta en Cannes, sino que, ademas, va a indicarnos ese momento de bifurcacion entre dos politicas, la federal y la nacional, y la incorporacion de una idea clave para configurar la dialectica entre subjetividad y nacion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.195 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".