MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spider silk as a resource for future biotechnologies

2007· article· en· W1507618289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander Sponner

Bibliographic record

VenueEntomological Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilk-based biomaterials and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAkademie Věd České Republiky
KeywordsSILKSpiderBombyx moriBiologySpider silkCannibalismZoologyLivestockInsectTheridiidaeDomesticationEcologyPredationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Insect silks have been used by mankind for millennia to produce textiles and in particular, the cocoon silk of Bombyx mori was the base of one of the most important industries in history. In fact, B. mori is probably the only domesticated insect if not invertebrate in its true and strict sense, comparable to cattle and other livestock that humans have known and bred since the Neolithic period. In contrast, reports regarding the use of spider silk throughout history have the character of travellers’ tales or anecdotes, and serious attempts to exploit these biomaterials on a large scale have not been undertaken until recently. Indeed, the cannibalism of these carnivores makes their farming difficult and the production of significant yields of spider silk virtually impossible. Only today, with recombinant technologies available, does this problem seem to have been overcome. But why use spider silk at all – if we have the infrastructure to produce significant yields of silk from Bombyx? In contrast to most insects, spiders do not spin from labial glands, and many spiders possess different types of gland, most of them active throughout the whole lifespan. Typical orb‐weavers (Araneoidea) for instance possess up to seven different types of silk gland to produce different silk fibers and glues. Each of these products has evolved for a particular use and the respective material properties are highly adapted to that use. As the group of Araneae is about 400 million years old, the oldest fossil orb‐weaver is dated about 150 million years, and the use of silk is crucial to a spider's survival, we can expect that evolution will have “squeezed out every iota” to achieve optimum performance at minimum cost. Indeed, some dragline silks such as the major ampullate silks of some Nephila species show amazing mechanical properties that, in terms of toughness, are far superior to Bombyx silk. Labels like “stronger than steel” or “even better than Kevlar” were attached to them, and the Canadian‐based biotech company Nexia created the trademark “bio‐steel” for their prospective product. The discovery of these exceptional mechanical properties of those protein fibers triggered intense research on spider silk, with the goal of their commercial exploitation. But there is more to Arachne's weave and science is beginning to pick up those threads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntomological ResearchSame topicSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsFrench-language works237,207