MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1507940788 · doi:10.15210/interfaces.v8i2.7032

PRODUIRE ET DIFFUSER LA CULTURE DANS LES VILLES MOYENNES: LE CAS DE QUÉBEC, TROIS-RIVIÈRES ET RIMOUSKI.

2012· article· fr· W1507940788 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fernand Harvey

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A produção e a difusão da cultura é geralmente estudada em função das grandes cidades. Em cada país, observa-se o domínio de uma metrópole cultural que concentra os recursos humanos e financeiros, as mídias e o star system. Mas, e as outras cidades e regiões não-metropolitanas? Estão elas condenadas à dependência e ao papel de simples consumidoras da cultura das metrópoles? Em que medida podem elas, por sua vez, tornar-se agentes de criação e de difusão da cultura? Qual é o papel dos agentes culturais e outros na dinâmica cultural de uma cidade média ou pequena na manutenção de uma vida cultural autônoma? Estas questões serão analisadas a partir de uma pesquisa feita por Fernand Harvey e sua equipe em três cidades do Quebec – Québec, Trois-Rivières e Rimouski - e concernentes a seis atividades ou eventos culturais. Nas discussões que seguirão, seria interessante saber se tal problemática é aplicável às regiões do Brasil.Résumé: La production et la duffusion de la culture est généralement étudiée en fonction des grandes villes. Dans chaque pays on note la domination d’ une métropole culturelle qui concentre les ressources humaines et fínancières, les médias et le star system. Mais qu’en est-il des autres villes et des régions non métropolitaines? Sont-elles condamnées à la dépendance et au rôle de simple consommatrices de la culture des métropoles? Dans quelle mesure peuvent-elles à leur tour devenir des agents de création et de diffusion de la culture? Quel est le rôle des agents culturels et autres dans la dynamique culturelle d’une ville moyenne ou de petite taille dans le maintien d’une vie culturelle autonome? Ces questions seront analysées à partir d’une enquête menée par Fernand Harvey et son équipe dans trois villes du Québec – Québec, Trois-Rivières et Rimouski – et concernant six activités ou événements culturels. Lors des discussions qui suivront, il serait intéressant de savoir si une telle problématique est applicable aux régions du Brésil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicCultural Industries and Urban Development→French-language works237,207→