Hand Grip Strength is Associated With Body Sway Rate Among Older Adults With Intellectual Disability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The authors undertook a study to determine whether hand grip strength is associated with body sway rate among older adults with intellectual disability. They employed cross‐sectional data from a nonrandomized controlled trial. Subjects were 16 older adults (8 females and 8 males; mean age 51.3 year) with mild‐to‐moderate intellectual disability residing in a supported living facility in I srael. Voluntary hand grip strength was measured isometrically using J amar® hydraulic dynamometer, and body sway was assessed by P osture S cale A nalyzer. Multivariate adjusted logistic regression model was used. Findings showed that hand grip strength in both arm flexed and extended was associated with body sway (−.608 to −.879), particularly among males. In females, the association was found only in eyes open condition, whereas in males it was found with both eyes closed and open. The authors concluded that hand grip strength was found to be negatively correlated with body sway rate and that low grip strength was associated with greater body sway. Low grip strength may be a rehabilitative impairment worthy of further investigation as a modifiable factor linked to sway rate among older adults with intellectual and developmental disability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.126 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".