Harnessing Information and Communication Technology to Build an Online Community of Northern/Rural Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Northern British Columbia (BC) is avast geographic area covering almost 600,000 square kilometres, with a population density ofless than one person per square kilometre. Less than 50 per cent of the 300,000 people residing in northern BC live in communities with a population of more than 10,000 people with the remaining living in communities of less than 5,000 people (Province of British Columbia). Given its geography, demographic features, and lack of proximity to the lower mainland, receiving appropriate health and social services in northern BC can be a challenge. Regardless of geographical location, women already face a disproportionately negative impact from poverty, violence, and economic inequality (Lippman, 1998; Lock, 1998). For northern women, this challenging situation is further complicated by geographic, social, and cultural isolation; lack of access to basic needs, appropriate housing and employment; uncertain resource-based economies; and lack of appropriate health and social services (Leipert; Leipert and Reutter 2005; Madrid). In fact, women living in the North, have a life expectancy that is four years less than their southern counterparts (British Columbia Provincial Health Officer). The detrimental effect of these negative factors increases manifold when coupled with issues related to culture, sexual orientation, abilityldisability, age and race (Leipert and Reutter 1998). T o further compound the situation, recent (and ongoing) government cuts to health and other social services have caused increased hardship for many northern and rural communities in British Columbia. T o overcome obstacles related to inequality and injustice resulting from living in a northernlrural setting, a group of women from across northern BC have come together to develop the Women North Network (WNN)-a primarily web-based network that harnesses information and communication technology (ICT) as a tool to connect women around issues of common concern. W N N allows women, who might otherwise have no way of coming together, to share experiences, information, and resources. Its formation has made it possible to build an online community aimed at addressing rural women's issues by overcoming barriers (e.g., distance, climate, prohibitive travel costs or non-existent public transportation, etc.) that isolate women in their geographic community-barriers that tend to confine and limit focus to local (often crisis oriented) concerns. Through connecting across the region, women are coming to recognize that local concerns about the health and wellbeing of their communities and families have larger structural, systemic implications that need to be addressed collectively and beyond narrow geographic confines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".