MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1508936233

Looking Backward and Moving Forward: Early House Building Patterns among the Yorkshire Settlers of Chignecto

2007· article· en· W1508936233 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peter Ennals, Deryck W. Holdsworth

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnologyGeographyHumanitiesEmigrationHistoryArtArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emigrants from a limited geographical area, who formed cohesive colonies in early Canada are often assumed to have reproduced much of their known material culture in the new setting. It is reasonable to expect that after the initial testing of these “traditional” cultural patterns, settlers might either adapt to new circumstances such as climate or availability of materials, or abandon the traditional forms altogether in the face of new practices learned from other cultural groups in the new setting. These general assumptions provide the framework for examining the housing practices of the Yorkshire settlers in Chignecto based on the available documentary and surviving evidence and what is known of pre-emigration housing patterns. As a prelude to examining the new world experience of these people, the paper surveys the forms of housing in the Yorkshire areas from which emigrants derived. Resume On pense souvent que les immigrants en provenance d’une aire geographique bien circonscrite, et qui ont constitue des groupes ayant une bonne cohesion lors des premieres colonies du Canada, auraient reproduit la plus grande partie de ce que l’on connait de leur culture materielle dans leur nouvel habitat. Il est raisonnable d’estimer qu’apres avoir tout d’abord eprouve leurs schemas culturels « traditionnels », les colons se soient adaptes aux nouvelles circonstances telles que le climat ou la disponibilite des materiaux, ou bien qu’ils aient abandonne les formes traditionnelles en meme temps qu’ils apprenaient de nouvelles pratiques d’autres groupes culturels dans leur nouveau lieu de vie. Ces hypotheses generales fournissent le cadre d’analyse des pratiques d’habitation des colons de Chignecto, originaires du Yorkshire, en nous basant sur la documentation existante, les preuves a l’appui de la survie et ce que nous connaissons des schemas d’habitation precedant l’emigration. Cet article explore les formes d’habitat dans la region du Yorkshire d’ou vinrent ces immigrants en tant que prelude a l’analyse de l’experience de ces gens dans le nouveau monde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielleSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207