Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article est essentiellement le texte d'un discours prononc par l'Archiviste national du Canada, M. Ian E. Wilson, au dbut de l'an 2000, lors du Sminaire Riley qui portait sur la destruction des documents et des amendements projets la Loi sur l'accs.Comme l'explique Richard Brown en prsentation, l'article s'inspire d'un texte publi par l'ex-archiviste fdral W. Kaye Lamb et intitul "The Fine Art of Destruction."M. Wilson met l'accent sur la gestion de l'information comme une ressource corporative et un actif pour le gouvernement ; il signale que les Archives nationales du Canada peuvent la fois contribuer au dveloppement de normes pour l'industrie de l'information, lesquelles peuvent s'appliquer l'ensemble du gouvernement, tout en poursuivant leurs propres intrts quant la prservation des documents ayant une valeur archivistique et historique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it