Neurite morphogenesis of identified visual interneurons and its relationship to photoreceptor synaptogenesis in the flies, Musca domestica and Drosophila melanogaster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first neuropile, or lamina, of the fly's optic lobe comprises a model set of identified neurons that are arrayed in cylindrical modules, called cartridges. The cartridge acquires adult form only in the second half of the fly's pupal life. All cells are by then correctly located within each of the lamina's cartridges (Drosophila, Musca), becoming invested by glial cells after 75% of pupal development (P + 75%). In adult cartridges, two lamina cells, L1 and L2, receive input from photoreceptor terminals R1-R6, at so-called tetrad synapses that form in the pupa when these cells' dendrites contact R1-R6. Single-section electron microscopy (EM, Drosophila) and serial-EM reconstructions of L1 and L2 (Musca) reveal relationships between the morphogenesis of L1/L2 dendrites and the formation of tetrads. Neurite outgrowth is initially (P + 55%) random and neurites are unbranched; many neurites invaginate surrounding terminals of R1-R6 but, later, embrace the outer surfaces of these. The maximum profusion of neurites at P + 74% coincides with peak numbers of nascent tetrads; neurites then branch vertically, in the lamina's depth. Later, neurites failing to reach R1-R6's outer surfaces regress. Down the length of their axons, L1 and L2's neurites initially form a random sequence, L1 partnering L1 as often as L2, etc., but beginning at P + 74%, L1 partners L2, and L2 partners L1, with progressive strictness. L1 has more neurites overall than L2. These observations are consistent with the following hypotheses: a neurite only survives if it contacts a presynaptic site; a synapse only survives if it progressively acquires the appropriate number and combination of postsynaptic neurites, culminating in a tetrad; an interaction exists between the neurites of L1 and L2, so that the growth of one respects the pattern of growth of the other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".