MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509675410 · doi:10.1143/jjap.39.2670

New Ferroelectric Ba<sub>5</sub>Ti<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub>

2000· article· en· W1509675410 on OpenAlex
S G Ingle, Naresh M. Patil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthorhombic crystal systemCrystal structureFerroelectricityCrystallographyLattice constantMaterials scienceScatteringReflection (computer programming)DiffractionLattice (music)IonCrystal (programming language)X-ray crystallographyDielectricChemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new crystalline material grown by the flux method and identified chemically and through density and structure determination as Ba 5 Ti 2 O 7 Cl 4 has been synthesized, and is shown to possess ferroelectric properties. The structure is found to be orthorhombic at room temperature using powder method of X-ray diffraction. The lattice constants at room temperature are a =8.526 Å, b =7.608 Å and c =11.696 Å with an uncertainty of ±0.0025 Å. The crystal has a space group Pmc2 1 , and the atomic positions are shown to confirm with the observed X-ray reflection intensities. It is found that two lattices related to each other by the interchange of a and b axes describe the crystal structure, and the X-ray intensities can be explained by considering the ions present on both the lattices for a given ( h k l ) plane. The use of the atomic scattering factors available in literature give the correct X-ray intensities, if the microstructure present in the crystal in the form of pronounced twinnings on planes (100), (200), (010), (020), (001), (020), (110), (220) is taken into account. The calculations are done using trial and error method anticipating the atomic positions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it