MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509717214 · doi:10.1089/15230860152665037

The FAD-PAS Domain as a Sensor for Behavioral Responses in <i>Escherichia coli</i>

2001· review· en· W1509717214 on OpenAlexaff
Barry Taylor, Anuradha Rebbapragada, Mark S. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueAntioxidants and Redox Signaling · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCanada Research Chairs
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsPAS domainEscherichia coliTransduction (biophysics)BiophysicsBiochemistryRedoxHAMP domainBiologyMutagenesisElectron transport chainChemistrySignal transductionCell biologyBinding domainBinding siteMutationTranscription factorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aer, the aerotaxis receptor in Escherichia coli, is a member of a novel class of flavoproteins that act as redox sensors. The internal energy of the cell is coupled to the redox state of the electron transport system, and this status is sensed by Aer(FAD). This is a more versatile sensory response system than if E. coli sensed oxygen per se. Energy-depleting conditions that decrease electron transport also alter the redox state of the electron transport system. Aer responds by sending a signal to the flagellar motor to change direction. The output of other sensory systems that utilize redox sensors is more commonly transcriptional regulation than a behavioral response. Analysis in silico showed Aer to be part of a superfamily of PAS domain proteins that sense the intracellular environment. In Aer, FAD binds to the PAS domain. By using site-specific mutagenesis, residues critical for FAD binding and sensory transduction were identified in the PAS domain. The PAS domain appears to interact with a linker region in the C-terminus. The linker region is a member of a HAMP domain family, which has signal transduction roles in other systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntioxidants and Redox SignalingSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207