MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509870170 · doi:10.1109/mnet.2015.7166186

5G wireless network: MyNET and SONAC

2015· article· en· W1509870170 on OpenAlexaff
Hang Zhang, Sophie Vrzic, Gamini Senarath, Ngqc-Dung Dào, Hamid Farmanbar, Jaya Rao, Chenghui Peng, Hongcheng Zhuang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Network · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless WANComputer networkMulti-frequency networkWireless networkMunicipal wireless networkHeterogeneous networkRadio resource managementWirelessNetwork architectureDistributed computingWi-Fi arrayTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Future 5G wireless networks will face new challenges, including increasing demand on network capacity to support a large number of devices running applications requiring high data rates and always-on connectivity; immensely diverse service requirements and characteristics; and supporting the emerging business models in the wireless network market requiring networks to be more open. New challenges drive new solutions and require different strategies in the network deployment, management, and operation of future 5G wireless networks compared to those of current wireless networks. One of the key objectives of future 5G wireless networks is to flexibly provide service-customized networks to a wide variety of services using the integrated cloud resource and wireless/wired network resources, which may be offered by multiple infrastructure providers and/or operators. In this article, we describe a novel wireless network architecture, MyNET, and one of the key enabling techniques called SONAC. In MyNET, basic logical functions are identified for both the control plane and the data plane. These basic functions include existing network functions, with some extensions/enhancements, as well as new network functions. SONAC selects and deploys a subset of these functions to provide customized network services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE NetworkSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207