MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1510315439

Genèse et mutation de la Loi sur les décrets de convention collective au Québec

2011· article· fr· W1510315439 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacques Rouillard

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecreeLabour lawCollective bargainingCollective agreementLabor relationsPolitical scienceIndustrial relationsGovernment (linguistics)LawLiberalizationEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Act on the legal extension of labour collective agreements was adopted by the Quebec government in 1934 to protect workers affected by the economic crisis and to help them to organize in unions. Promoted by Catholic unions, it bears a unique model of labour relations that does not prevail elsewhere in North America. The law, which relies on labour-management cooperation, allows the government by decree to extend a collective agreement concluded by a union to all firms of an industry in a given territory. His philosophy originated from the social doctrine of the Catholic Church with the ultimate goal of setting up professional corporations, the basic unit of corporatist society. The law passed a year before the Wagner Act, the Magna Carta of organized labour in the United States, that inspired the adoption of a law with the same principles in Quebec in 1944. This law provides stiff competition to the law of decrees that remains, however, in industries where competition is strong and where labour means a large part of production costs. In the 1970s, the law is experiencing a renewed interest by unions and industrial relations specialists to facilitate union recognition by areas or by many employers in the same bargaining unit. The highly decentralized bargaining framework of the Labour Code was seen not well suitable to the evolution of the labour market. Since the 1980s, the decree system is harm by the liberalization of labour relations in the wake of neo liberalism. In this mood, the government abolished the decrees regulating the work of 23 000 employees in the garment industry. In Quebec as elsewhere, the whole system of labour relations born in the 1930s is eroded as the government is swayed by the deregulation of collective labour relations. Resume La Loi relative a l’extension juridique des conventions collectives de travail est adoptee par le gouvernement du Quebec en 1934 pour proteger les travailleurs frappes par la crise economique et favoriser leur syndicalisation. Fruit de revendications des syndicats catholiques, elle porte un modele particulier de relations de travail qui ne s’imposera pas ailleurs en Amerique du Nord. La loi, qui mise sur la collaboration patronale-syndicale, permet au gouvernement d’etendre par decret a toutes les entreprises d’un secteur industriel, dans un territoire determine, les termes d’’une convention collective conclue par un syndicat. Sa philosophie est issue de la doctrine sociale de l’Eglise catholique avec comme but ultime la formation de corporation professionnelle, cellule de base de la societe corporatiste. La loi est adoptee une annee avant le Wagner Act, la «Magna Carta» du mouvement syndical aux Etats-Unis, qui inspire l’adoption de lois similaires Canada et au Quebec pendant la Deuxieme Guerre. Cette loi apporte une dure concurrence a la loi des decrets qui demeure presente cependant dans les industries ou la concurrence est vive et ou la main d’œuvre represente une forte proportion des couts de production. Dans les annees 1970, la loi connait un regain d’interet du cote des syndicats et des specialistes de relations indus-trielles afin de faciliter l’accreditation sectorielle ou multi patronale. On juge que le cadre de negociation tres decentralise selon le Code du travail ne repond plus aux transformations du marche du travail. Depuis les annees 1980, le regime des decrets est touche par la liberalisation des relations de travail dans le sillage du courant de pensee neoliberal. Dans cet esprit, le gouvernement abolit en 1999 les decrets de l’industrie du vetement, ce qui affecte 23 000 salaries. Au Quebec comme ailleurs, c’est tout le systeme de relations de travail ne des annees 1930 qui s’erode a mesure que le gouvernement se laisse gagner par la dereglementation des rapports collectifs de travail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207