MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Radical cystectomy for patients with pT4 urothelial carcinoma in a large population‐based study

2010· article· en· W1510434633 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Liberman, Ahmed Alasker, Maxine Sun, Salima Ismail, Giovanni Lughezzani, Claudio Jeldres, Lars Budäus, Rodolphe Thuret, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Hugues Widmer, Paul Perrotte, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Urology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystectomyMedicineBladder cancerUrologyUrinary diversionOncologyCohortPopulationEpidemiologyRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicineUrinary bladderSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End ResultsUrothelial carcinomaStage (stratigraphy)CancerCancer registry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study Type – Therapy (cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Given the natural history of pT4 urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder, and the substantially poorer survival of pT4 patients relative to pT3, it may be argued that radical cystectomy is not justified in these patients. Relying on a large population‐based retrospective analysis, the current study identified two main categories of patients with pT4 urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. The first comprised of patients with pT4b disease, whose disease phenotype was clearly more aggressive than their pT3 counterparts. The second group consisted of patients with pT4a disease, whose disease phenotype was very similar to patients with pT3. These findings indicate that patients with pT4b disease should be provided with the maximal amount of therapeutic interventions, such as administration of early adjuvant chemotherapy and perhaps early adjuvant radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE To examine cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) in patients with pT4N 0–3 M 0 urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) and to compare it to patients with pT3N 0–3 M 0 , in a population‐based cohort treated with radical cystectomy (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS RCs were performed in 5625 pT3‐T4bN 0–3 M 0 patients with UCUB within 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries between 1988 and 2006. Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of pT4a vs pT4b vs pT3 stages on CSM. Covariates consisted of age, gender, race, lymph node status and SEER registries. All analyses were repeated in 3635 pN 0 patients. RESULTS Of 5625 patients, 2043 (36.3%) had pT4aN 0–3 , 248 (4.4%) had pT4bN 0–3 and 3334 had pT3N 0–3 (59.3%) UCUB. The 5‐year CSM was 57.6% vs 81.7% vs 53.9% for, respectively, pT4aN 0–3 vs pT4bN 0–3 vs pT3N 0–3 patients (all log‐rank P = 0.008). In multivariable analyses the rate of CSM was 2.3‐fold higher in pT4b vs pT3 ( P < 0.001), 1.1‐fold higher in pT4a vs pT3 ( P = 0.002) and 2.0‐fold higher in pT4a vs pT4b patients. After restriction to pN 0 stage, pT4b patients had a 2.3‐fold higher rate of CSM than pT3 patients ( P < 0.001) and pT4b patients had a 2.1‐fold higher rate of CSM than pT4a patients ( P < 0.001). The CSM rate was the same for pT4a and pT3 patients ( P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that patients with pT4a UCUB have similar CSM as those with pT3 UCUB. Consequently, RC should be given equal consideration in patients with pT3 and pT4a UCUB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of UrologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207