MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1510839502 · doi:10.4404/hystrix-14.0-4250

Prima segnalazione di Brachylaima fulvus Dujardin, 1843 (Digenea, Brachylaimidae) in Sorex cfr. antinorii Bonaparte, 1848 (Insectivora, Soricidae) in Italia

2003· article· it· W1510839502 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juan Carlos Casanova, Concetta Milazzo, Gaetano Aloise, Mara Cagnin, Alexis Ribas

Bibliographic record

VenueBollettino del CILEA (CILEA) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesInsectivoraArtBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un?indagine parassitologica è stata condotta su esemplari di Sorex cfr. antinorii Bonaparte, 1840 (Insectivora, Soricidae) catturati in Sila Grande (Valle Capra; 16.29.30; 39.21.40). Uno degli esemplari è stato trovato parassitato da Trematodi digenei rinvenuti nell?esofago e nello stomaco. I parassiti isolati sono stati fissati con liquido di Bouin, colorati con carminio acetico di Semichon, fissati in una serie di alcooli, chiarificati in xilolo e montati con Balsamo del Canada. I parassiti sono stati identificati come membri della Famiglia Brachylaimidae Joyeux & Foley (1930) appartenenti al genere Brachylaima Dujardin (1843). La morfologia generale ed i caratteri metrici hanno permesso di identificarli come B. fulvus Dujardin, 1843 (lunghezza corpo: 2.39-2.46; larghezza corpo: 0.72-0.78; diametro trasversale ventosa orale: 212.48- 238.08x240.64-266.24; ventosa ventrale: 250.88-258.56x250.88-266.24; faringe 120.32-168.96; testicoli: 151.04-189.44x168.96-189.44; ovario: 122.88x171.52; uova: 26-30x2-17). Il range dei dati morfometrici coincide con quelli riscontrati da diversi autori negli esemplari di B. fulvus in Europa centrale e occidentale (Jourdane, 1971; Lewis, 1969; Zarnowski,1960; Mas-Coma & Gallego, 1975). Dopo la descrizione originale, la sistematica di B. fulvus Blanchard, 1847 non è stata mai confutata, sebbene varie specie dei generi Harmostomum Braun, 1899 e Panopistus Sinitzin, 1931 siano state proposte come sinonimi di B. fulvus da diversi autori. Zarnowski (1960) considera aperta la questione di identità di H. (H.) dujardini Baer, 1928 e propone la sinonimia di B. oesophagei Shaldibin, 1953 e B. fulvus. Lewis (1969), al contrario, ha riconvalidato B. oesophagei come specie, utilizzando criteri che, però, Jourdane (1971) ritiene, non idonei a differenziare le due specie. Mas-Coma & Gallego (1975), considerano B. oesophagei sinonimo di B. fulvus. È questa la prima segnalazione di B. fulvus in Italia e in S. antinorii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBollettino del CILEA (CILEA)Same topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207