Electronic speckle pattern interferometry observation of brick–mortar interface behaviour under compressionThis article is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue on Masonry.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The brick–mortar interaction is important in the mechanical behaviour of masonry. It affects the load transfer considerably, as shown by detailed deformation measurements taken using electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI), a laser speckle interference technique. A companion paper [Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34(11), 1475 (2007)] by the authors of this paper argues that the joint is the only part of contemporary masonry significantly affected by manual action, which is why large material variations appear at the brick–mortar interface. To evaluate this phenomenon, ESPI measurements were performed and compared with accompanying linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) results. The behaviour of specimens loaded with various eccentricities was relatively soft in the brick–mortar interface area when compared with the behaviour shown in the surrounding stiff brick and mortar. The brick–mortar interface was characterized by a central part surrounded by fissures. Most of the load was transmitted in the central part. Because of this, the axial strain curve over the width of the specimens was U-shaped for concentrically loaded specimens (i.e., those with zero eccentricity). Over the height of the two-brick one-joint specimen, a smooth, B-shaped lateral strain curve was observed, in which the largest strains were found in the bricks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".