The Impact of a Clinical Pharmacist on Patient and Economic Outcomes in a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Unit
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background and Objective: It has been shown that clinical pharmacists positively influence quality of care and decrease drug expenditures in hospital settings. This 2-part study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist on patient and economic outcomes in a pediatric mental health setting. Methods: In the first part of the study, a 4-week prospective evaluation period, pharmacist-initiated interventions were documented. This information was distributed to a panel of assessors, who determined the impact of each intervention on patient care. In the second part of the study, a retrospective cost analysis was used to compare drug costs for 2 consecutive years, the 12-month period before and the 12-month period immediately after institution of the clinical pharmacy position. A matched-pair t-test and regression analysis were conducted on the cost data. Results: The pharmacist initiated 48 interventions during the 4-week period, 47 (98%) of which were accepted by the treating physician. Eighty-six percent (38/44) of the interventions were assessed as having a positive effect on patient care. Drug cost per patient-day was 14% lower in the year after implementation of the pharmacy position, and the difference was statistically significant in the last 8 months of that year (p = 0.0019). Total drug costs decreased by 21%, a cost saving of $5485.80. Conclusions: The clinical pharmacist had a positive impact on both clinical and economic outcomes in this pediatric mental health population. RESUME Historique et objectif : On a demontre que les pharmaciens cliniciens influaient positivement sur la qualite des soins et faisaient baisser le cout des medicaments en milieu hospitalier. Cette etude de deux phases a ete menee pour evaluer l’incidence des interventions du pharmacien clinicien en termes de resultats therapeutiques et de repercussions economiques dans un etablissement de soins de sante mentale pour enfants. Methodes : Dans la premiere phase de l’etude, soit une periode d’evaluation prospective de quatre semaines, les interventions entreprises par le pharmacien ont ete documentees. L’information ainsi recueillie a ete distribuee a un comite qui a evalue l’incidence de chaque intervention sur les soins au patient. Dans la seconde phase de l’etude, une analyse retrospective des couts — au moyen d’un test de Student apparie et d’une analyse de regression — a ete menee pour comparer le cout des medicaments sur une periode de deux annees consecutives, soit la periode de douze mois avant et celle immediatement apres la mise en place du poste de pharmacien clinicien. Resultats : Des 48 interventions entreprises par le pharmacien durant la periode de quatre semaines, 47 (98 %) ont ete acceptees par le medecin traitant et 86 % (38/44) se sont revelees avoir un effet positif sur les soins aux patients. Le cout des medicaments par jour-patient etait 14 % plus bas dans l’annee suivant la mise en place du poste de pharmacien clinicien, et on a observe une difference statistiquement significative dans les huit derniers mois de cette annee (p = 0,0019). Le cout total des medicaments a diminue de 21 %, ce qui s’est traduit par des economies de 5 485,80 $. Conclusion : Le pharmacien clinicien a eu une incidence positive a la fois sur les resultats therapeutiques et sur les couts au sein de cette population d’enfants en milieu de soins de sante mentale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it