MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1511481682 · doi:10.25011/cim.v30i4.2847

Molecular characterization of the development of the K65R and M184V drug resistance mutations in Subtype C HIV-1s

2007· article· en· W1511481682 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dimitrios Coutsinos, Cédric Invernizzi, Daniela Moïsi, Maureen Oliveira, Bluma Brenner, Mark A. Wainberg

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverse transcriptaseBiologyResistance mutationDNAMutationGeneVirologyMolecular biologyVirusDNA sequencingRNAGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: We have shown that the K65R mutation is selected more rapidly in subtype C than in subtype B HIV-1 isolates in both cell culture and clinical studies. Biochemical comparisons between subtype B and C-derived reverse transcriptase (RT) enzymes revealed similar molecular characteristics that do not explain the more rapid selection of K65R with subtype C viruses. This study attempts to establish the mechanistic basis for the difference. Methods: Recombinant subtype C and B HIV-1 RT enzymes were expressed and purified in E. coli. Gel-based nucleotide extension assays were used to study DNA synthesis from various natural and synthetic DNA and RNA templates that spanned regions of the pol gene responsible for the K65R and M184V mutations. Cell based experiments were performed using MT2 cells infected with mutated subtype B HIV-1 pNL4-3 viruses. Results: The propensity for the more rapid selection of K65R with subtype C enzymes is due to the mechanism of DNA synthesis from a subtype C template. The use of templates containing the 64, 65 and 66 codons of the pol gene led to different patterns of DNA synthesis. When subtype C RT was employed to synthesize DNA from subtype C templates, preferential pausing was seen at the nucleotide position responsible for the AAG to AGG mutation on codon 65 which gives rise to K65R. In contrast, the use of subtype B RT together with a subtype B template reveals a different pattern of DNA synthesis. When subtype B RT was employed with a subtype C template, DNA synthesis stopped at the exact nucleotide position responsible for K65R. This phenomenon was not observed when subtype C RT was used with a subtype B template. A similar method was employed to investigate if differences exist in the appearance of M184V between subtypes. The results suggest that M184V is not favoured due to its coding sequence and that the propensity for the development of M184V remains the same in subtype B and C HIV. In cell culture, K65R was detected faster in subtype B that has been mutated to include the 64/65 codons of subtype C, when compared to wild-type subtype B HIV. Conclusions: The more rapid emergence of K65R but not M184V in subtype C RT appears to be based on the pol gene coding sequence. These results urge for the analysis of resistance mechanisms to be studied in all HIV subtypes separately and have clinical relevance in regard to the management of subtype C infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicine→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→