MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512333553 · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.06.803

896. Local Direct Injection of BMP2-Modified Fibroblasts Induces Ectopic Bone Formation in Immunocompetent Mice

2004· article· en· W1512333553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone morphogenetic protein 2Cell biologyChemistryCancer researchMedicineBiologyIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) is a nongovernmental, standards-setting organization that advances public health by ensuring the quality and consistency of medicines founded in 1820. USP standards are developed by a unique process of involvement by the scientific and regulatory communities and are accepted worldwide. Within the USP, the development of standards for gene therapy products is being lead by the Gene Therapy, Therapy and Tissue Engineering Expert Committee (GCT). This group is composed of scientists and clinicians from academic medical centers, the biopharmaceutical industry, and various government agencies, including Health Canada, U.S. National Institutes of Health, U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Activities of GCT include the development of the USP general information chapter Cell and Gene Therapy Products, which became official in April 2002. This general chapter summarizes the issues and best current practices in the manufacturing, testing and administration of cell and gene therapy products. GCT is currently developing a general information chapter on the qualification of ancillary materials (also referred to as ancillary products, ancillary reagents, processing agents) used in the manufacture of gene and cell therapy products. The proposed general chapter Ancillary Materials for Cell, Gene and Tissue-Engineered Products, will be published in the USP publication Pharmacopeial Forum in March 2004 for public review and comment. GCT is also working with other USP Expert Committees to revise the general chapter Design and Analysis of Biological Assays. This presentation will outline the content and scope of USP general information chapters relevant to cell and gene therapy, and explain how the scientific community can become involved in the development of standards for gene therapy products at USP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207