Selective antagonism of medial prefrontal cortex D<sub>4</sub> receptors decreases fear‐related behaviour in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is well known that the mesolimbocortical dopamine pathway is highly active during periods of stress and fear. However, very little research has directly examined how dopamine receptors in this pathway influence fear-related behaviour. The present study examined the effects of selective antagonism of D(4), D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) on rats' fear behaviour in the elevated plus-maze and the shock-probe burying tests. The results demonstrated that bilateral intra-MPFC infusions of the highly selective D(4) antagonist, L-745 870 (0.2, 1 or 10 nmol/0.5 microL), increased the percentage of open-arm entries and open-arm time in the elevated plus-maze test (1 nmol/0.5 microL), and decreased the duration of burying in the shock-probe test (0.2 or 1 nmol/0.5 microL). Furthermore, none of the doses of the D(4) antagonist affected measures of general activity or pain sensitivity. Intra-MPFC infusions of the D(1) antagonist, SCH-23390 (0.2 or 1 nmol/0.5 microL), or the D(2) antagonist, remoxipride (0.2, 1 or 10 nmol/0.5 microL), had no significant behavioural effects in either test. Taken together, these findings suggest that MPFC D(4) receptors may play an important role in the mediation of fear-related behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".