MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512537148

The Economics of Alternative Crops in the Brown and Dark Brown Soil Zones of Saskatchewan

2000· dissertation· en· W1512537148 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
David D. Wall

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · 2000
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsAgroforestryGeographyForestryEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to investigate the sustainability of alternative cropping systems in the Brown and Dark Brown soil zones of Saskatchewan. Three components of sustainability are examined; economic effects, environmental effects and social acceptance. The primary objective of this project is to investigate the short and long-term economic effects of introducing pulses and oilseeds into existing cereal crop rotations. Representative farms were developed and used in the assessment of profitability and risk for four competing alternative rotations including a cereal based benchmark system. Production costs, financial linkages and stochastic prices and yields are used to simulate farm income, expenses, cash flows and net worth for a 15 year period. Stochastic dominance testing is used to determine the profitability and risk for each of the competing rotations based on annualized net returns. The second objective was to identify the change in soil productivity and resource use efficiency from the widespread use of these new cropping systems. The EPIC model is used to simulate a 30 year cropping pattern for each of the alternative crop rotations. The simulation results indicate that there are rotational benefits in short-term off-site resource usage. The results of the whole farm production model support the following conclusions. (1) Rotations that include lentil, with low price and yield correlations, produce higher net farm income and lower have economic risk. (2) Market risk is reduced by increasing cropping diversity. (3) Production risk is highest in the early adoption phase. (4) There is a cost savings in nitrogen fertilizer usage for crop rotations that include lentil; however, this cost savings is diminished by increased chemical and equipment costs. (5) Extended rotations that include lentil and canola are preferred over 2-year and 3-year wheat-fallow rotations by risk averse producers in the Brown and Dark Brown soil zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207