MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1512756872 · doi:10.3917/ela.164.0405

Les canadianismes, ces inconnus les traductions italiennes de Maria Chapdelaine de Louis Hémon

2012· article· fr· W1512756872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gerardo Acerenza

Bibliographic record

VenueÉla Études de linguistique appliquée · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maria Chapdelaine de Louis Hémon est un classique de la littérature du Canada français. Publié après la mort de son auteur d’abord en France, en 1914, sous forme de feuilleton et ensuite au Canada, en 1916, sous forme de livre, ce chef-d’œuvre a connu plusieurs rééditions dans le monde entier. En Italie, il a été traduit cinq fois : la première par Lorenzo Gigli en 1924 et la dernière par Ugo Piscopo en 1986. Ce roman contenant presque une centaine de particularités linguistiques du français parlé au Canada au début du XX e siècle, dans cette étude nous montrons que les stratégies adoptées par les traducteurs pour rendre en italien certains canadianismes ne sont pas toujours cohérentes et pertinentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉla Études de linguistique appliquéeSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207