MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1513187709

Of Things Said and Unsaid: Power, Archival Silences, and Power in Silence

2006· article· en· W1513187709 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilenceUnsaidHumanitiesPower (physics)ArtEthnologyHistoryPolitical scienceLiteratureAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte examine les dynamiques du silence aux archives.Il soutient que le silence peut se dfinir, au moins en partie, comme la manifestation des actes poss par ceux qui dtiennent le pouvoir afin d'empcher aux marginaux d'avoir accs aux archives.Il affirme que cet enjeu a un impact significatif sur la capacit des groupes marginaliss de constituer leur propre mmoire et leurs propres histoires sociales.Les archivistes et les chercheurs peuvent lire les archives contre le grain et ils peuvent commencer mettre en valeur ces silences et donner une voix ceux qu'on a rprims.Cette activit peut toutefois s'avrer difficile et contentieuse et on ne peut l'aborder la lgre.Cet article examine ensuite comment le silence peut tre une mthode favorise par les groupes marginaliss qui refusent de verser leurs documents aux archives comme un moyen d'exercer leur propre pouvoir sur ceux qui dtiennent le pouvoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it