López Luján Leonardo y Guilhem Olivier (eds), El sacrificio humano en la tradición religiosa mesoamericana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
photos 1 Ce gros livre de presque 600 pages est la publication des interventions d'un aropage de 28 scientifiques internationaux (Mexicains, Belge, Franais, Japonais, Canadiens, Nord-Amricains) runis Mexico en septembre 2007 pour un sminaire consacr au sacrifice humain. L'objectif principal de cet ouvrage est de prsenter les nouvelles avances sur les significations, les fonctions et l'volution historique du sacrifice humain en Msoamrique en considrant les informations manant de diverses disciplines : archologie, anthropologie physique, biologie, histoire des religions et ethnologie. Comme le souligne Alicia Mayer, directrice de l'Instituto de investigaciones histricas de la UNAM, dans l'introduction, les fonctions et les significations du sacrifice humain sont nombreuses et varient en fonction des participants et des contextes rituels ; cet vnement ne peut tre rduit des interprtations univoques et il est ncessaire de l'analyser dans le cadre de ses diffrents contextes historiques (p. 18). cette fin, les interventions rendent compte des multiples expressions du sacrifice dans des gographies et des poques diffrentes, allant du Prclassique la priode contemporaine, tout en couvrant la majeure partie du territoire msoamricain, des chaudes terres mayas du Sud aux arides terres du Nord.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".