Neonatal thyroid screening results are related to gestational maternal thyroid function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between maternal thyroid function at each pregnancy trimester and neonatal screening results. BACKGROUND: Overt maternal thyroid dysfunction during gestation is associated with poor neonatal thyroid function. However, research on the relationship between suboptimal maternal thyroid function (assessed at three trimesters) and neonatal thyroid screening outcome is scarce. DESIGN/PATIENTS: Prospective follow-up study during three trimesters of gestation in 886 Dutch Caucasian healthy pregnant women followed from 12-week gestation until term delivery (>37 weeks) and their neonates. MEASUREMENTS: The relation between neonatal data from the Congenital Hypothyroidism (CH) screening and maternal thyroid determinants [TSH, FT4 and thyroid peroxidase (TPO)-Ab] assessed at 12-, 24- and 36-week gestation. RESULTS: Boys have lower screening TT4 levels and their mothers have higher TSH levels at 24- and 36-week gestation. Higher maternal TSH levels (>97·5th percentile, as defined in 810 women without TPO-Ab at 12 weeks) at one or more times during pregnancy (O.R: 2·26, 95% CI: 1·20-4·29) and lower gestational age (O.R: 1·22, 95% CI: 1·05-1·41) are independently related to lower screening TT4 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal thyroid function during gestation is related to neonatal TT4 at screening. The finding of both lower neonatal TT4 levels in boys and higher TSH levels in mothers carrying boys is worthy of further investigation, as both observations may be meaningfully related.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".