MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1513696212 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011695

Spin-up of Be stars in the pre-main sequence phase

2002· article· en· W1513696212 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Stȩpień

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsStellar rotationAccretion (finance)StarsStellar magnetic fieldMagnetic fieldIntermediate polarMain sequenceRotation periodAngular momentumT Tauri starStellar massStellar mass lossRotation (mathematics)AstronomyStellar evolutionStar formationWhite dwarfSolar windCoronal mass ejectionClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an attempt to explain faster than average rotation of Be stars, a model for rotational evolution of a pre-main sequence (PMS) star with a weak primordial magnetic field was applied to stars with masses between 3 and 7 solar mass. The model takes into account the accretion of matter along the magnetic field lines, the stellar field-disk interaction and a magnetized wind. Evolutionary changes of the stellar moment of inertia are also included. The stellar mass and magnetic flux were assumed constant during the PMS evolution. The results indicate that magnetic accretion spins up a star early in its PMS life and if the star has a short PMS life time (i.e. high enough mass), it may keep faster rotation until the zero age main sequence (ZAMS). Detailed calculations show that typically a factor of two faster rotation is achieved compared to the conserved angular momentum case. This requires an intense accretion going on for a substantial fraction of the PMS phase in the presence of a surface magnetic field not exceeding 400 G. Stronger fields slow down the stellar rotation very efficiently by the magnetic field-disk locking mechanism. Low mass stars with PMS life time significantly longer than the time scale of spin down by the magnetic wind may be efficiently braked by the wind operating after the disappearance of the disk. They can retain faster than average rotation only under very special conditions. It is postulated that ZAMS progenitors of Be stars possess fossil magnetic fields with surface intensity between 40 and 400 G. The fields result in rotation rates about two times higher than those of normal stars in full agreement with the observations. If the observed Be stars have already evolved from ZAMS, their present magnetic fields should be correspondingly weaker due to the evolutionary increase of the stellar radius. ZAMS stars with magnetic fields weaker than about 40 G should have normal rotation and those with fields significantly stronger than 400 G should become slowly rotating Ap-Bp magnetic stars. The case of β Cephei, with its present surface magnetic field close to 400 G, is a special case of an intermediate field, strong enough to slow down the star's rotation in the PMS phase but apparently not strong enough to develop Bp star characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→