In Vitro Systems for the Study of T Cell Development: Fetal Thymus Organ Culture and OP9‐DL1 Cell Coculture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most T cell development occurs within the thymus and includes a series of selection processes that are, in large part, still poorly understood. Studies of T cell development have been greatly advanced by the description of multiple phenotypic subsets of T cells and their maturational relationships. This unit describes a system for observing and modulating T cell development in vitro via the culture of entire mouse fetal thymic lobes. Methods are included for the isolation of fetal thymi and culture to allow for normal T cell development on either transwell plates or Gelfoam sponges. A method for depleting hematopoietic cells from thymic lobes using 2'-deoxyguanosine and subsequent reconstitution with precursor cells is also described. This protocol is valuable for the study of tolerance and T cell selection. A support protocol describing methods of altering and monitoring T cell development are outlined. In addition, methods for culturing fetal thymic lobes under high oxygen submersion conditions and for the preparation of reaggregate thymus organ cultures are provided. Finally, a simple and practical method that allows for the thymus-independent generation of T cells from defined sources of stem/progenitor cells by OP9-DL1 coculture is described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".