MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1514407023 · doi:10.4000/pallas.571

« Ah ! qui dira les torts de l’Égypte… » Lorsque Paul Perdrizet louait les mérites de l’hellénisme à Franz Cumont

2013· article· fr· W1514407023 on OpenAlex
Daniela Bonanno, Corinne Bonnet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePallas · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parmi les pages d’un tirage à part de Franz Cumont conservé à l’Academia Belgica, on a récemment découvert une lettre inédite de Paul Perdrizet (1870-1937), helléniste, archéologue, auteur de nombreuses publication touchant à la Grèce, à l’Anatolie, au Proche-Orient et à l’Égypte sous influence hellénique. Dans cette lettre, Perdrizet exprime de virulentes critiques à l’encontre de la culture égyptienne et à son influence négative sur l’hellénisme d’époque lagide. L’analyse de ce document et du contexte intellectuel dans lequel il s’insère fournit l’occasion de réfléchir sur la perception que Franz Cumont avait de la terre des pharaons et sur sa façon d’interpréter la rencontre entre la culture hellénique et la culture égyptienne à l’époque hellénistique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it