← Back to cohort
Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications
António Augusto de Sousa, Vlastimil Havran, Alexis Paljic, Tabitha C. Peck, Christophe Hurter, Helen C. Purchase, Giovanni Maria Farinella, Petia Radeva, Kadi Bouatouch
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueCommunications in computer and information science · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Academy of SciencesUniversidad de LeónInstitute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. LouisUniversidade Lusófona de Humanidades e TecnologiasLomonosov Moscow State UniversityUniversité de ParisUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroTokyo Metropolitan UniversityIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaUniversitat de LleidaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteHochschule NiederrheinTechnische Universität IlmenauAkademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanislawa StaszicaTrakya ÜniversitesiUniversidad de ZaragozaIran University of Science and TechnologyNational Taipei University of TechnologyUniversità degli Studi di TorinoUniversidade do MinhoTurun YliopistoUniversità degli Studi di PaviaUniversità degli Studi di GenovaKuwait UniversityUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaUniversité Paris DescartesRoyal Holloway, University of LondonNanyang Technological UniversityUniversità di CataniaUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeUniversité de StrasbourgLunds UniversitetManchester Metropolitan UniversityAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgUniversitatea Tehnică din Cluj-NapocaDeakin UniversityUniversitat Jaume IUniversità di BolognaAristotle University of ThessalonikiUniversidad del CaucaNational Central UniversityUniversity of WollongongCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversitat de BarcelonaFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaEdinburgh Napier UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of South DakotaSveučilište u ZagrebuUniversity of Western MacedoniaOulun YliopistoYale UniversityUniversity of GlasgowUniversidad de JaénPolitechnika WarszawskaUniversità degli Studi di CagliariUniversity of EssexUniversitat de GironaNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetUniversité de BourgogneUniversità degli Studi di SalernoUniversity of PatrasUniversidade de AveiroUniversity of Northern ColoradoUniversidad de SevillaUniversity of OtagoUniversity of ThessalyUniversidade da Beira InteriorUniversità degli Studi dell'InsubriaLiverpool John Moores UniversityPolitecnico di TorinoConcordia UniversityTrinity College Dublin
KeywordsComputer graphicsComputer scienceGraphicsComputer graphics (images)Artificial intelligenceComputer vision
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.964
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno