Molecular delineation of deletions on 2q37.3 in three cases with an Albright hereditary osteodystrophy‐like phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A minority of the reported cases of terminal 2q37 deletion clinically resemble Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO)/pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism and have only mild-to-moderate mental retardation. Our molecular and cytogenetic fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) findings on an additional three patients further reduce the size of the minimal critical region deleted in this syndrome to about 3 Mb. This region includes the G-protein-coupled receptor 35 (GPR35), glypican 1 (GPC1), and serine/threonine protein kinase 25 (STK25) genes on 2q37.3. We have further defined several polymorphic variants within the coding region and flanking regions of GPR35 gene, which could potentially be useful for rapid detection of GPR35 gene deletion. We postulate that the absence of GPR35 may, at least partly, account for the phenotypic resemblance to the AHO. We also believe that the deletion of GPR35 could be responsible for the entity brachydactyly mental retardation syndrome (OMIM #600430), which was coined based on the above minority of patients with terminal 2q37 deletion. We recommend that every patient with AHO phenotype should undergo 2q subtelomeric FISH screen and subsequently a molecular study on the GPR35 gene. GPC1 and/or STK25 haploinsufficiency may also contribute to the AHO-like phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".