MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Postmodernist Reading of Harold Pinter’s “The Homecoming”

2011· article· en· W1516240451 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noorbakhsh Hooti, Samaneh Shooshtarian

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostmodernismHomecomingIndeterminacy (philosophy)DramaPhilosophyLiteratureAbsurdismPostmodernityExistentialismPower (physics)DepictionAestheticsPsychoanalysisArtEpistemologyArt historyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a dramatist, Pinter, more than anyone else in the 20th century, has changed our expectations of the stage language, and has made more tradition treatments of stage, action and language seem ridiculous. He is an enigma to critics. Some consider him an absurdist, others an existentialist and some place him in the group of anti-humanists and the amoral. In this case, Pinter’s drama does not seem irrelevant to postmodern theatre. The power of most of Pinter’s plays originate from the truth of a speaker’s feeling that always lies in the unspoken words or in what has come to be known as “Pinter’s pauses”. His works illustrate the power of language and also its unreliability, what is labeled in postmodernism as “indeterminacy” or “against interpretation”. His uniqueness originates from his ability to create tension between the absurdist tradition with its baffling, purposeless activities and naturalistic use of language which is rendered through believable details. As an example of a postmodern drama The Homecoming seems to display the persistence of the past in the present, indeterminacy, irony, anarchy, happening and silence which are known as the main elements of postmodernism. It is, then, attempted to show that in his depiction of certain aspects of family life and relationships that are common to all families in greater or lesser degree, Pinter’s The Homecoming seems to bring into account a consideration of postmodernity according to Derrida’s concept of “deconstruction”, however, Lyotard’s “Fall of Metanarratives” and “Language Game” are of certain significance within the postmodernist approach towards the play. Finally, it is concluded that all these features together have been the real key to the sense of “fragmentation” and “inconsistency” felt among the play’s family members and have completed the postmodernist environment which is evident within the postmodern plays. Key words : Postmodernist Literature; Postmodernist Feminism; Metanarrative; Language Game; Parody; Difference; Delogocentrism; Indeterminacy Resume: En tant qu’un dramatiste, Pinter, plus que tous les autres dramatistes dans le 20eme ciecle, a change nos attentes concernant le langage de la scene, et a fait des reformes sur la scene, l’action et le langage qui semblent ridicules. Il est une enigme pour les critiques. Certains le considerent comme un absurde, d’autres un existentialiste et certains le placent dans le groupe des anti-humanistes et des amoraux. Dans ce cas, le drame de Pinter semble avoir des rapport avec le theatre post-moderne. La puissance de la plupart des pieces de Pinter vient de la verite du sentiment d’un orateur qui se trouve toujours dans les non-dits ou dans ce qui est connu sous le nom des “pauses de Pinter”. Ses oeuvres illustrent la puissance du langage et son manque de fiabilite, ce qui est marque dans le postmodernisme comme “indetermination” ou “contre l’interpretation”. Son caractere unique provient de sa capacite a creer des tensions entre la tradition absurde et ses chicanes, des activites sans but et l’utilisation naturaliste du langage a travers des details credibles. En tant qu’un exemple du drame postmoderne, Le retour semble afficher la persistance du passe dans le present, l’indetermination, l’ironie, l’anarchie, happening et le silence qui sont connus comme les principaux elements du postmodernisme. Il est, ensuite, tente de montrer que dans sa description de certains aspects de la vie familiale et les relations qui sont communes a toutes les familles plus ou moins, Le retour de Pinter semble prendre en consideration un element de la postmodernite selon le concept de Derrida de la “deconstruction”, cependant, “la chute des metarecits” et “langue du jeu” de Lyotard sont d’une certaine importance dans l’approche postmoderne vis-a-vis de la piece. Enfin, il est conclu que toutes ces caracteristiques ont ete la veritable cle pour le sentiment de la “fragmentation” et de “l’incoherence” ressenties par les membres de la famille dans la piece et qui ont complete l’environnement postmoderniste qui se manifeste au sein des pieces postmodernes. Mots-cles: Litterature Postmoderne ; Feminisme Postmoderne ; Metarecit ; Jeu De Langage ; Parodie ; Difference ; Delogocentrisme ; Indetermination

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207