Visual field deficits following anterior temporal lobectomy: Long‐term follow‐up and prognostic implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of mild (<or=90 degrees) versus severe (>90 degrees from vertical) visual field defects (VFDs) in patients after anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), and their postoperative improvement over time. METHODS: The angles of postoperative VFDs of 75 patients who underwent ATL were recorded at various time points (1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36+ months). RESULTS: Of all 23 patients who came in for their <1 month postoperative appointment, 65% of patients had surgically induced VFDs <90 degrees , whereas 35% had VFDs >90 degrees postoperatively. Patients in the latter group were reported for suspension of their driver's license. However, 38% experienced improvement of their VFD to <90 degrees such that their driver's license could be reinstated. Of patients with any VFD, 18-30% improved on average by a magnitude of 38 degrees within the first year postoperatively. DISCUSSION: Although 35% of the VFDs that occur following temporal lobe surgery are severe, approximately 38% of these patients (especially those with starting postoperative VFDs closer to the 90 degrees angle) experience some improvement shortly after surgery. This may increase their chances of having their driver's license reinstated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".