Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following our successful first five years of publication the International Wound Journal has made some changes to its editorial structure. We have disbanded our Editorial Executive team as the main function of this group was to act as ambassadors to help establish the Journal. We wish to thank our Editorial Executives for helping to make the journal the success. All of our Editorial Executives have agreed to remain as members of our Editorial Board and some have become Associate Editors. We have created this new role of Associate Editor to help take the IWJ forward for the next five years. This role will continue to support the philosophy of internationalism and interdisciplinary nature of the journal. These individuals will provide guest editorials on a number of current and important global issues; will deliver important review articles on interesting topics and will also work with authors to help continue the high quality content that the IWJ has provided to date. Please join us in welcoming our new Associate Editorial Team: Prof. David Armstrong, Podiatrist, Researcher, USA Prof. David Leaper, General Surgeon, Researcher United Kingdom Prof. Kyoichi Matsuzaki, Plastic Surgeon, Researcher, Japan Heather Orsted, Nurse, Educator, Canada Prof. Patricia Price, Statistical Advisor, Researcher, United Kingdom Prof. Gregory Schultz, Biochemist, Researcher, USA Prof. Geoff Sussman, Pharmacist, Educator, Australia These are individuals who bring the diversity, internationalism and experience required to drive the IWJ to the next level. All have accepted this challenge and are enthused with enhancing the IWJ in 2009 and beyond. So in 2009 what, as readers, do you have to look forward to! Well, in addition to increasing quality and quantity of papers our new Associate Editors will provide guest editorials on relevant topics. Sometimes these will focus on regional matters, other times dealing with international issues. Many will contain important new information and occasionally they will address deliberately provocative subjects. This is a team of individuals who will help broaden the perspectives of our journal and its editorial content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".