Synthesis and characterization of super‐absorbent hydrogels based on hemicellulose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT A kind of novel hemicellulose‐based hydrogel with excellent water absorbency was synthesized by the graft copolymerization of acrylic acid (AA), acrylic amide (AM) with hemicellulose. The various factors that influenced the water absorbency of the modified hemicellulose were studied, including AA content, hemicellulose content, neutralization degree of AA, and weight ratio (to monomer) of cross‐linker and initiator. The optimal conditions were found as follows: m(AA) : m(AM) : m(hemicellulose) = 15 : 3.5 : 1, the neutralization degree of AA was 75%, and weight ratio (to monomers) of the cross‐linker and the initiator was 0.03% and 1.0%, respectively. The maximum absorbencies toward distilled water and 0.9 wt % NaCl solution were 1128 g/g and 132 g/g, respectively. The characteristics of the hydrogels were also investigated by Fourier Transform InfraRed (FT‐IR), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and atomic force microscope (AFM). The results indicated that the undulant surface and broad network structure offer the hydrogels excellent water absorbency. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132 , 42441.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".