Bibliographic record
Abstract
The book Fenmensuosuilu was written by Wen Ge, who lived in early time of the Southern Song Dynasty. It includes the enhanced parts of Chen Ye, a famous writer in the Mid-term of Southern Song. Most of the contents quoted by Sikuquanshu and other ancient books come from the original texts of Fenmensuosuilu. The agricultural part of Fenmensuosuilu enlarges agricultural work fields, and it has an active effect on establishing a greater agricultural framework. Most of items in this part reflect the actual agricultural situations between Song Dynasty and Yuan Dynasty, some of which can rewrite the conclusions of the agriculture history. It also provides more evidence for the research on some ancient books. Keywords: Fenmensuosuilu; greater agricultural framework; agriculture historyResume: Le livre Fenmensuosuilu est ecrit par Wenge, qui vivait au debut de la dynasite Song du Sud. It englobe des ecrits de Chenye, un ecrivain celebre dans le mi-parcours de la dynastie Song du Sud. Sikuquanshu (四庫全書) et d'autres livres anciens ont cite des textes originaux de Fenmensuosuilu. La partie agricole' de Fenmensuosuilu elargit les domaines des travaux agricoles, et il a un effet actif sur la construction d'un cadre de l'agriculture a grande echelle. La plupart des articles dans cette partie refletent la situation reelle de l'agriculture entre la dynastie Song et la dynastie Yuan, dont certains peuvent reecrire l'histoire de l'agricultre. It peut offrir egalement plus de preuves pour les recherches sur certains anciens livres.Mots-cles: Fenmensuosuilu (分門瑣碎錄); cadre de l'agriculture a grande echelle; histoire de l'agriculture
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".