Blood Flow and Metabolic Control at the Onset of Heavy Exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rate of increase in oxygen uptake (VO2) at the onset of a bout of heavy exercise is faster if it is preceded by a similar bout of heavy exercise. We tested the hypothesis during heavy leg exercise that leg blood flow (LBF) and VO2 would both be elevated during the adaptive phase. On three separate days, six healthy young men completed two bouts of 6-minutes of knee extension / flexion exercise at about 85% VO2peak separated by 5-minutes 0-watt exercise on an electrically braked ergometer. LBF was determined by Doppler ultrasound. In the second exercise bout, LBF and VO2 were significantly elevated in the baseline before exercise and throughout the exercise. Both the mean response time (time to 63% of difference between baseline and calculated end value) and the difference in VO2 between minutes 3 and 6 of exercise indicated significantly faster attainment of the end exercise value in the second heavy exercise bout. These data showing the elevated LBF in the second bout of heavy exercise support the link between O2 delivery and the adaptation of oxidative metabolism at the onset of heavy exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".