MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1516931571 · doi:10.11575/prism/30197

Rethinking project management – Old truths and new insights.

2001· article· en· W1516931571 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicConstruction Project Management and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAthabasca University
KeywordsComputer scienceEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2) Norwegian Project Management Forum (NPMF).NPMF is a joint venture between Norwegian Association of Project Management (NAPM), and Norwegian Centre of Project Management.The mission of Project Management (PM) is to promote theory and practice in the field of project management and project-oriented business.It is the policy of PMAF and NPMF to publish one issue of PM yearly, which will be distributed free of charge.In addition to the world-wide free distribution, the Finnish and Norwegian project management associations include the yearly issues in their publications list, which enables that individuals and organizations outside the distribution network can have single copies to be sent to them for a reasonable price.The main distribution channels comprise circulation arranged by national project management associations to their members and distribution to the attendants of international events on project management in cooperation with the arranging organization.The circulation of the journal is 5 000 copies.The aim of PM is to reach extensively interest of project management experts and professionals worldwide in any sector both in academic world and industry, and this way to extend communication between all different sectors of industries including the public sector, universities and research organizations.The PM seeks articles on any aspects of project management for publication.In addition to reviewed academic articles, it welcomes papers of more practical nature.Authors are encouraged to submit the following types of original manuscript: summaries of research results; surveys on current practices; critical analysis and developments of concepts, theories, practices, methodologies, application or procedures; analyses of success or failure in the business context; and case studies.The division of the journal content follows subdivision of papers into different paper types.The paper types recognized are application papers, research papers, and notions and summaries.In the selection of research paper manuscripts for publication the primary importance will be based on the original contribution and novelty value and the extent to which they advance the knowledge on project management.In selecting application papers, it is required that the paper discusses recent advancements of project management in any industrial sector or public sector in terms of empirical applications, applicability, and practical utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it