Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he City provides a review of core concepts in urban studies and urban sociology.Assessing a wide range of literatures and disciplines, Stevenson offers a critical exegesis of major works and schools of thought that comprise urban studies.Her position is that theories of the city are more than abstract ideas.As Stevenson puts it, "just as concepts, theories and methods shape academic and professional perspectives on the city, they also influence the character and experience of urbanism" (p. 1).The author defines urban studies as a multidisciplinary research area that borrows theoretical and methodological tools from across the social sciences and the humanities.As Stevenson notes, the city is made up of abstract, material, and experiential dimensions that overlap but that are not reducible to one another.Stevenson organizes the book into a thematic analysis of the theoretical city, the material city, the everyday city, the dark city, the emotional city, the global city, and the imagined city.In the first chapter, she examines conceptualizations of the city ranging from those of the original Chicago School to the analyses of American and French Marxists.Stevenson critiques the biological and concentric zone models deployed by the Chicago School, then assesses the lack of focus on state agencies in early urban studies.She explains the differences between Manuel Castells' theorization of consumption and the urban, and David Harvey's subsequent analyses of cities as sites of crisis and capital accumulation.Harvey's advance is in viewing real estate investment as a primary circuit of capital, whereby urbanization becomes one of the key elements of capital accumulation.Stevenson then explores Henri Lefebvre's rhythm analysis, which offers a unique temporal and spatial approach for understanding urban experience.Stevenson suggests that all theoretical positions offer key tools for examining the multiple layers of the city, and that theoretical and methodological integration is constantly required in urban studies.Stevenson then moves on to examine class, inequality, and production in cities.She argues that capitalist production was a major force initiating and intensifying urbanization, but the same transformation also produced new sites of inequality (such as the deprived areas of 19th cen-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".