MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517260484

ELECTRICAL ANISOTROPY AND BEDROCK FRACTURING: IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEM?

2000· article· en· W1517260484 on OpenAlex
Melvyn E. Best, Gordon Guy, G. D. Spence, Stan E. Dosso, Kevin Telmer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedrockGeologyOutcropClassification of discontinuitiesGroundwaterGround-penetrating radarBoreholeAzimuthGneissShieldAnisotropyGroundwater flowElectrical conductorGeomorphologySeismologyAquiferRadarGeometryGeotechnical engineeringPetrologyMaterials sciencePhysicsOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently EM-31 and ground penetrating radar (GPR) surveys were carried out over the Hartland landfill located just north of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. The bedrock geology in the area of the landfill consists mainly of gneiss overlain by a thin layer (up to 2 m thick) of till. Outcrop in the area reveals the presence of fracture discontinuities throughout the bedrock. A ground and surface water monitoring program for the landfill has shown that contaminated groundwater escaped from the leachate containment and collection systems. Vertical-dipole EM-31 data collected every 2 m along east-west oriented lines spaced 10 m apart clearly outline the direction and extent of leachate propagation. Several approximately north-south conductive features (most likely associated with fractures) about 10 to 20 m in width are also visible. The conductivity of these features decreases with distance from the landfill, thus indicating conductive groundwater is flowing down-gradient. Dipping events that line up with the linear EM conductors can be seen on several east-west GPR profiles. Vertical-dipole azimuthal conductivity data were collected at a number of stations along these lines. Azimuthal conductivity data is obtained by rotating the line joining the transmitter and receiver coils about a vertical axis and taking readings at equal angles (in our case 15 degrees). Signal-to-noise was improved by using reciprocity, i.e using the fact the EM response should be the same when the transmitter and receiver coils are interchanged, and averaging responses separated by 180 degrees. Preliminary results indicate that azimuthal conductivity can vary by as much as 30% between maximum and minimum values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it