MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517306372

Effect of ultraviolet light C on bacterial colonization in chronic wounds.

2005· article· en· W1517306372 on OpenAlexaff
Thao P Thai, David Keast, Karen E. Campbell, M. Gail Woodbury, Pamela E. Houghton

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioburdenMedicineBacteriaStaphylococcus aureusUltraviolet lightMicrobiologyPseudomonas aeruginosaSurgeryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultraviolet light C (light wavelength 200 nm to 290 nm) has been shown to kill cultures of antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. To evaluate the ability of ultraviolet light C to reduce the amount and type of bacteria present in chronically infected ulcers, as well as to establish the test-retest reliability of the semi-quantitative swab technique, a prospective, one-group, pre-post treatment study was conducted among patients receiving treatment in several in- and outpatient facilities and nursing homes. Individuals with chronic ulcers exhibiting at least two signs of infection and critically colonized with bacteria (n = 22) received a single 180-second treatment using an ultraviolet light C lamp (wavelength = 254 nm) placed 1 inch from the wound bed. Semi-quantitative swabs taken immediately before and after UVC treatment were used to assess changes in the bacterial bioburden present within the wound bed. Results demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability of the semi-quantitative swab technique used to evaluate the type and amount of bacteria present in chronic wounds (Cohen's kappa = 0.92). Assessment of wound bioburden using semi-quantitative swabs revealed a statistically significant (P <0.0001) reduction in the relative amount of bacteria following a single treatment of ultraviolet light C. The greatest reduction in semi-quantitative swab scores following ultraviolet light C treatment were observed for wounds colonized with the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa and wounds colonized with only one species of bacteria. Significant (P <0.05) reductions in the relative amount of bacteria also were observed in 12 ulcers in which methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was present. These results confirm previous laboratory studies and demonstrate that ultraviolet light C can kill bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus present in superficial layers of chronic wounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207