MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517771244 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab3

3 P66SHC, BUT NOT P53, IS INVOLVED IN EARLY ARREST OF IN VITROPRODUCED BOVINE EMBRYOS

2004· article· en· W1517771244 on OpenAlexaff
Laura A. Favetta, Claudia E. Robert, W.A. King, Dean H. Betts

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastocystEmbryoBiologyEmbryonic stem cellEmbryogenesisApoptosisAndrologyCell biologyProgrammed cell deathCell cycle checkpointSomatic cellSenescenceCell cycleGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High embryo losses occur in the first week of bovine embryo development, before the activation of the embryonic genome, with a high percentage of embryo death and arrest. Arrested embryos appear morphologically normal and do not exhibit any characteristic sign of apoptosis, including DNA fragmentation. We hypothesized that these embryos enter a senescence-like state and that both the cell cycle regulatory protein p53 and the stress-related protein p66shc, which are involved in the onset of senescence in somatic cells, are responsible for this early embryonic arrest of development. The aim of this study was to characterize the expression of p53 and p66shc in 2–4 cell-arrested bovine embryos. Our experimental model consists of in vitro-produced bovine embryos, co-cultured with oviductal cells. In our in vitro production system 86.8 ± 41.4% of embryos cleave, 13.5 ± 0.5% arrest at the 2–4 cell stage and 24.5 ± 0.7% develop to the blastocyst stage. Cleavage occurs between 26 hours post-insemination (hpi) and 48 hpi. Embryos that cleave by 28 hpi show only 0.6 ± 0.3% of 2–4 cell arrest and 41.2 ± 2.1% of blastocyst development, whereas 14.2 ± 0.9% of later-cleaving embryos arrest at the 2–4 cell stage and only 26.5 ± 1.7% develop into blastocysts. We compared 2–4 cell embryos collected at 28 hpi with those arrested at the 2–4 cell stage and collected at Day 8 post-insemination. Quantification by Real Time PCR showed significantly higher p66shc mRNA levels (P < 0.001), but no changes in p53 mRNA levels (P = 0.860) in arrested embryos v. 28-hpi embryos (n = 3 pools of 100 embryos each). We obtained the same pattern of p53 and p66shc mRNA expression when we compared 28-hpi embryos with later-cleaving embryos (28 hpi to 48 hpi, n = 3 pools of 100 embryos each), and higher p66shc mRNA levels (P < 0.050), or similar p53 mRNA levels (P = 0.960). We also confirmed higher p66shc protein levels (P < 0.001), but no changes in p53 protein levels (P = 1.000), in later cleaving embryos compared with 28 hpi-cleaving embryos by semi-quantitative immunocytochemistry (n = 70). Statistical analysis was carried out using 2-sample t-test or the equivalent nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney test). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the developmental potential of in vitro-produced embryos is related to the time of first cleavage and that p66shc, but not p53, plays a role in early developmental arrest of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Further experiments are required to investigate the functional role of p66shc in early embryo arrest. Funded by NSERC, CIHR, OGS and OMAFRA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207