Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 Stringently Regulates Distinct Functions of IL-7 and IL-15 In Vivo during T Lymphocyte Development and Homeostasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SOCS1(-/-) mice accumulate within the thymus and periphery CD8(+) lymphocytes that express memory cell markers and display heightened in vitro responses to common gamma-chain cytokines. To investigate whether dysregulated homeostasis of T lymphocytes and acquisition of memory phenotype by CD8(+) cells in SOCS1(-/-) mice were mediated by IL-7 and/or IL-15 in vivo, we have generated SOCS1(-/-)IL-7(-/-), SOCS1(-/-)IL-15(-/-) and SOCS1(-/-)IL-7(-/-)IL-15(-/-) mice. We observed that in mice lacking SOCS1, either IL-7 or IL-15 skewed thymocyte development toward CD8 lineage, whereas IL-15 is the principal mediator of dysregulated homeostasis in the periphery. Homeostatic proliferation of SOCS1(-/-) CD8(+) lymphocytes in Rag1(-/-), Rag1(-/-)IL-7(-/-), Rag1(-/-)IL-15(-/-), and Rag1(-/-)IL-7(-/-)IL-15(-/-) mice showed that SOCS1 deficiency did not overcome the requirement for IL-7 and IL-15 to sustain homeostatic expansion. Differential expression of memory phenotype markers CD44, CD122, and Ly6C by SOCS1(-/-)IL-15(-/-) CD8(+) lymphocytes suggest that multiple signals contributed to the memory cell differentiation program. To address whether increased IL-15 responsiveness of SOCS1(-/-) CD8(+) lymphocytes required prior TCR sensitization, we generated SOCS1(-/-) H-Y TCR transgenic (Tg) mice. Using female SOCS1(-/-) H-Y TCR(tg) mice in Rag1(+/+) and Rag1(-/-) backgrounds, we show that acquisition of the memory phenotype by SOCS1-deficient CD8(+) lymphocytes did not require prior antigenic stimulation, but required the presence of activated T cells. SOCS1 deficiency accelerated the maturation of CD8 single-positive thymocytes expressing Tg TCR, but did not compromise negative selection in HY-TCR(tg) males. Our findings illustrate distinct functions for IL-7 and IL-15 in T lymphocyte development and homeostasis, and stringent regulation of these processes by SOCS1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".