MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517977018

Analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump model with ovine myocardial infarction.

2009· article· en· W1517977018 on OpenAlexaff
Mona Abdolrazaghi, Mahdi Navidbakhsh, Kamran Hassani, Shahram Rabbani, Hossein Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineBalloonIntra-aortic balloon pumpIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingHemodynamicsDiastoleCardiac cycleAortic pressureAortaMyocardial infarctionSystoleArteryBlood pressureCardiogenic shock
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we have tried to model the effects of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) on myocardial infarction (MI) using the standardized data of MI in sheep which was obtained by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. METHODS: Mathematical model of whole cardiovascular system was presented in accordance to the arterial tree. The lumped parameter model was primarily obtained for a rigid vessel regarding the vessel diameter. In this study, the proper lumped model of every vessel was obtained by incorporating the rigid vessel lumped model into the capacitance as a compliance of the vessel. Intra-aortic balloon pump was modeled with the hemodynamic parameters of the aorta. It was assumed that balloon pump inflates at the beginning of the diastole and deflates near the beginning of the next systole. RESULTS: During balloon pumping, the vessel diameter variation function counter pulsates sinusoidally with the same period of the cardiac cycle. End systolic pressure and end diastolic pressure decreases along with hemodynamic flow optimized through systemic arteries due to balloon pumping in diastole. It has been shown that the blood flow in subclavian artery increases as well. Moreover, the cardiac work keeps low, which prone to lower oxygen consumption. The results of modeling are in good agreement with IABP documentation. CONCLUSIONS: The presented model is a useful tool for studying of the cardiovascular system pathology and the presented modeling data are in good agreement with the experimental ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207