MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517999966 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.11041

Matthew S. Buckley, Tragedy Walks the Streets ; Susan Maslan, Revolutionary Acts. Theater, Democracy and the French Revolution

2008· article· fr· W1517999966 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Bourdin

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTragedy (event)DemocracyDemocratic revolutionArtArt historyLiteraturePolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans un petit livre joliment prsent et illustr de 191 pages, notes et index compris, Matthew S. Buckley propose successivement cinq synthses : l'une sur le thtre de la Rvolution, l'autre sur le drame dans la mme priode, la troisime sur la Rvolution et le thtre politique anglais, les deux dernires tant consacres deux pices (La Chute de Robespierre de Coleridge, La Mort de Danton de Bchner). L'auteur, qui voit dans l'criture thtrale l'une des premires transcriptions de la Rvolution, prtend explorer le rle des vnements rvolutionnaires franais dans l'volution rapide des formes dramatiques, des annes 1780 aux annes 1840. Elle frappe pourtant selon lui d'obsolescence des auteurs comme Mercier, Beaumarchais, Diderot, au profit du mlodrame, d'une tragdie romantique qui hsite recourir aux formes anciennes du rcit, d'une prolifration de sous-genres qui ne sont que des ngations de la notion mme de genre . Cette volution est longtemps passe inaperue dans la masse des productions plus classiques, plus convenues, la remise en cause des codes ainsi propose rduite l'un des aspects de la destruction rvolutionnaire, alors mme que le drame se dtache du simple objet littraire pour se faire discours social, adapt au rapides mutations culturelles et politiques l'oeuvre. L'mergence des formes radicales

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207