MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518486918

School Health Promotion Policy in Nova Scotia: A Case Study

2012· article· en· W1518486918 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jessie‐Lee D. McIsaac, Meaghan Sim, Tarra L. Penney, Sara Kirk, Paul J. Veugelers

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaPolitical scienceHealth promotionHumanitiesContext (archaeology)Health policyEnforcementPublic healthPublic administrationSociologyMedicineGeographyEthnologyNursingLawHealth careArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to the growing concern of children’s health, many local governments have responded by implementing health promotion policies that support a health promoting schools (or comprehensive school health) approach. The purpose of this study is to explore the context and nature of policies that relate to health promoting schools in Nova Scotia. The results revealed that a number of policy initiatives had been developed (N= 348) at the provincial level (n=53) and across school districts (n=295). The policy scan demonstrated that there were many supportive policies at different levels of jurisdiction but incongruence of priorities and enforcement practices between the province and school districts. To optimize the impact of health promotion policies, different levels of jurisdictions need to work together and support the implementation of policies that support a health promoting schools approach. Compte tenu des inquietudes croissantes entourant la sante  des enfants, plusieurs paliers de gouvernements se sont dotes de politiques de promotion de la sante a l’ecole qui souscrivent a l’approche des ecoles axees sur la promotion de la sante (aussi appelee l’approche de sante globale dans les ecoles). Cette etude s’est interessee a l’encadrement et a la nature des politiques qui sous-tendent l’approche des ecoles axees sur la promotion de la sante en Nouvelle-Ecosse. Les resultats ont demontre que plusieurs projets d’elaboration de politiques ont ete lances (N= 348) a l’echelle provinciale (n=53) et au niveau des districts scolaires (n=295). Un survol de ces politiques a revele que meme si chaque palier de gouvernement s’est dote de politiques favorables en ce sens, leurs priorites et leurs modes d’application varient selon qu’elles relevent de la province ou des districts scolaires. Pour maximiser l’impact de ces politiques sur la promotion de la sante,  la province et les districts scolaires doivent collaborer et appuyer l’implantation de politiques au service de l’approche des ecoles axees sur la promotion de la sante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex JournalSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207