MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1519019469

Leisure activities and health: Conversations with isolated seniors

2010· article· en· W1519019469 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas R. Nichols

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecreationLeisure timeHumanitiesAgency (philosophy)SociologyPhysical activityPsychologyPolitical scienceGerontologyPublic relationsMedicineSocial scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Absolute and proportional numbers of older citizens are increasing. A substantial number of these citizens are effectively socially and/or physically isolated and largely inactive. There is an obvious relationship between activity of many kinds and health in the broadest sense, and no agency itself can effectively deal with all of the service-oriented issues which confront isolated seniors. Leisure, recreation and physical activity professionals are in a prime position to contribute toward enhanced quality of life for these individuals. Offering and operating effective, efficient and enjoyable activity opportunities is relatively straightforward. Identifying and attracting isolated seniors to these opportunities and fostering continued participation in leisure activities on as independent a basis as possible is much more problematic. Personal interviews conducted upon completion of a 10 week leisure activity program and again one year later confirmed the perception of isolation as a significant barrier to activity participation and that, regardless of how positively an isolated senior viewed an activity, continued and substantial assistance was necessary in order to encourage future activity participation. Le nombre proportionnel et le nombre absolu de personnes âgees ne cessent d'augmenter. Bon nombre de ces citoyens sont victimes d'une forme quelconque d'isolement social ou physique et sont reduits a des modes de vie nettement inactifs. Mais si le lien entre l'activite sous toutes ses formes et la sante au sens large est evident, aucun organisme ne saurait a lui seul composer avec tous les problemes de service qui confrontent les aines isoles. Les professionnels des loisirs et de l'activite physique sont particulierement bien places pour aider a ameliorer la qualite de vie des personnes âgees. De fait, il est relativement simple de trouver des facons de faire participer les aines a des activites a la fois efficaces, efficientes et agreables. II est nettement plus complique d'identifier les aines isoles et de les inciter a poursuivre leur participation a des activites recreatives de la facon la plus autonome possible. Des entrevues personnalisees menees a la fin d'un programme de loisirs de 10 semaines, puis un an plus tard, ont confirme l'impression que l'isolement est un obstacle majeur a la participation. De fait, peu importe combien la personne âgee isolee semblait avoir apprecie l'activite, il fallait investir des efforts importants et soutenus pour la convaincre de continuer de participer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex JournalSame topicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementFrench-language works237,207