Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iannis Xenakis used his diverse knowledge and understanding to challenge new ideas & approaches architecture & music, among other things. This study aims to examine the works of Xenakis and to analyse working simultaneously in sound and light and applying the same structures in another different fields. This study examines Philips pavilion, Polytopes and Diatope. Results of this study are as follows. Philips pavilion :1.The pavilion's architecture with its hyperbolic-paraboloid shells makes sound and light' space enrich. 2. Diversed sound and light' space make closed virtual space. Polytopes : 3. The steel cables acted ad regulating lines of several large hyperbolic surfaces. 4. Musical space is diverse in verticality. And the light space is composed of thousands of incandescent lights which mounted on a Cartesian grid. 5. Several layers of sound and light into existing architecture make space superimpose. Diatope : 6. The Diatope is hyperbolic-paraboloid shells. 7. Musical space is diverse in horizontality. And the light space is composed of thousands of incandescent lights which mounted on a Cartesian grid. 8. Philips pavilion ,Montreal Polytope and Cluny Polytope isolate and darken the interior space. The double-layered membrane of Diatope is semi-transparent and its spatial effect can be controlled and has active systems. So the Diatope is open to the enegetic waves that circulate in our environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".