Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iannis Xenakis used his diverse knowledge and understanding to challenge new ideas & approaches architecture & music, among other things. This study aims to examine the works of Xenakis and to analyse working simultaneously in sound and light and applying the same structures in another different fields. This study examines Philips pavilion, Polytopes and Diatope. Results of this study are as follows. Philips pavilion :1.The pavilion's architecture with its hyperbolic-paraboloid shells makes sound and light' space enrich. 2. Diversed sound and light' space make closed virtual space. Polytopes : 3. The steel cables acted ad regulating lines of several large hyperbolic surfaces. 4. Musical space is diverse in verticality. And the light space is composed of thousands of incandescent lights which mounted on a Cartesian grid. 5. Several layers of sound and light into existing architecture make space superimpose. Diatope : 6. The Diatope is hyperbolic-paraboloid shells. 7. Musical space is diverse in horizontality. And the light space is composed of thousands of incandescent lights which mounted on a Cartesian grid. 8. Philips pavilion ,Montreal Polytope and Cluny Polytope isolate and darken the interior space. The double-layered membrane of Diatope is semi-transparent and its spatial effect can be controlled and has active systems. So the Diatope is open to the enegetic waves that circulate in our environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it